Closing and integration examples: five late stage failures and the fix for each

Five completion failures, each of which went wrong in the last stretch or the first month, when both parties believed the difficult part was behind them.

No real private business, buyer, seller or adviser is described. Amounts shown are labelled typical U.S. ranges, not figures from a named deal. Each is set out as the mechanism that failed, the damage it did, and the small thing that would have prevented it.

What to take away

One: the consent nobody was chasing

The mechanism. The lease required the landlord's consent to an assignment. Both lawyers listed it as a condition. Neither side treated it as their job to pursue, because it appeared on both lists.

In U.S. practice this is usually a landlord consent to assignment, an estoppel certificate and, where a lender has a mortgage, a subordination, non-disturbance and attornment agreement. Landlord counsel often takes 10 to 30 days and charges a typical $1,500 to $5,000 review fee, though the range varies by lease and market.

The damage. Weeks passed with no application actually submitted. When it was, the landlord asked for information the seller had to assemble, then for their own costs to be covered, then for a meeting. The buyer's funding approval expired in the meantime and had to be renewed against more recent trading.

The prevention. One named owner per condition, with a date, on a single list both sides read. The closing and handover page explains why conditions involving outsiders should be started first: they are the only items nobody in the transaction controls.

Two: the peg set on the wrong season

The mechanism. The business traded unevenly across the year. The working capital target was set by reference to a period when stock was low and collections had been chased. Completion fell at the opposite point in the cycle, with the shelves full and invoices unpaid.

The documents are the net working capital definition, the sample calculation and the completion accounts. Accountants such as PwC, Deloitte, EY, KPMG, RSM, Grant Thornton and Baker Tilly test a 12-month trailing average or a seasonal index in Excel or NetSuite. A typical peg dispute sits in a $100,000 to $1,000,000 range, but the range depends on the business.

The damage. The completion accounts showed working capital far above the target, and the buyer owed the seller a payment they had not budgeted for. In the mirror image of this case, it is the seller who pays. Either way the party surprised feels cheated, and the argument runs for months.

The prevention. The figures were in the record all along, and diligence had them. Match the reference period to the completion date, or agree a seasonally adjusted target, and model the settlement against the last several periods before signing. This is arithmetic that can be done in an afternoon by either accountant. A seller preparation checklist can put the reference period question to the accountant months before completion.

Three: the definition that let one liability count twice

The mechanism. The deal was agreed on the basis that the seller kept the cash and cleared the debt. A liability sat in a category that the agreement treated as debt, and it also sat outside the working capital definition.

The controlling terms are usually Indebtedness, Debt-like Items, Net Working Capital and Cash-Free Debt-Free. Under U.S. GAAP, deferred revenue, accrued vacation, PPP loan forgiveness, unfunded pensions and deferred payroll taxes are common debt-like candidates. A line-by-line schedule in Excel or NetSuite, with a typical $25,000 to $250,000 disputed-item threshold, prevents the double count.

The damage. It reduced the price once as debt, and it did not raise the working capital target, so the seller carried it twice. Nobody had done this deliberately; the two schedules were drafted by different people at different times.

The prevention. One schedule, line by line, saying which items are inside working capital and which are debt or cash, with an illustrative calculation using real historical figures attached to the agreement. Your accountant produces it and your lawyer attaches it.

Four: the morning the business could not take payment

The mechanism. The card facility was in the seller's business name and could not be transferred. It required a new application by the new owner, which nobody had started because everyone assumed a transfer was possible.

The named providers are Stripe, Square, PayPal, Clover, Fiserv, Worldpay, Chase Paymentech and Elavon. Card network rules from Visa and Mastercard and the PCI DSS standard apply. A new merchant ID and gateway setup commonly takes 5 to 15 business days, with a rolling reserve of 5% to 10% for some trades.

The damage. The business could take cash and nothing else for its first days, in a trade where most customers pay by card. Takings fell, staff improvised, and the new owner spent the first week on the telephone instead of with customers. A payment route that cannot transfer is one line on a closing and integration checklist that should be worked two weeks before completion.

The prevention. This item belongs on the switchover list that the preparation work should already have started. Two weeks before completion, ask every payment provider what a change of ownership requires. Some transfer, some do not, and the ones that do not need an application with time in hand.

Five: the owner who did not leave

The mechanism. A transition period agreed in general terms: the seller would stay on to help. No plan named which relationships, systems or decisions were being transferred, to whom, or by when.

The named systems are Salesforce or HubSpot for customer relationships, NetSuite or QuickBooks for accounts, and Slack or Microsoft Teams for decisions. A consulting agreement, a non-compete and a Form 1099 or W-2 classification are the usual U.S. documents. A typical transition runs 3 to 12 months, with consulting pay of $5,000 to $20,000 per month, though both vary.

The damage. Staff continued to route decisions to the person they still regarded as in charge. The new owner's changes were quietly reversed or delayed. Customers kept calling the seller. Six months later the handover had not happened, and the buyer had inherited neither the authority nor the relationships they had paid for.

The prevention. A written handover plan with named recipients and dates, and a defined end to the seller's involvement. If part of the price is contingent on results, that interaction should have been settled when the deal structures were agreed rather than negotiated during the transition.

What runs through all five

Each failure was a gap between two people. Each believed the other was handling it: two lawyers, two accountants, two owners, a buyer and a provider, a seller and a successor. None was a failure of goodwill or required bad faith.

The whole prevention is a list with names and dates, made while there is still time for a third party to be slow.

Common questions